TheCoolest wrote:
if he was un-loyal enough to make deals behind vince's back, how could vince trust him with the WWF belt.
It had to be done because bret had full creative control for the last 30 days of his contract.
i can see the logic in both sides of the arguement. like i say it all comes down to whos side u wanna take from a outsiders point of view imo.
imo like u say Vince wasnt willing to take the chance and did what he had to do for business , all be it probably lucky to escape with his life among everyone surrounding that incident that night , all be it in Brets native Canada.
but as ive never been much of a Bret mark i believe it was right for business











