Login
Register
Subscribe | 
Back to Social Issues License to kill.
Tell people about this topic: Total Posts: 61 Posts
Posted: Wed 20th Aug 2008, 10:45 pm Whenever Im in a bad moodHimmler
Account removed
- Posted: Wed 20th Aug 2008, 10:53 pm
rootlesstree wrote:
true but you should be aloud to protect your property
and when it comes down to it thay may have a wepon so it would be a life endangering situation (is confronted)
You don't have to kill someone to protect your property.
Possibly injure them, but as long as they don't come at you with a knife, ring the police.Melissa.
Account removed
- Posted: Wed 20th Aug 2008, 10:54 pm Also you should be able to kill burglers imho
Himmler
Account removed - Posted: Wed 20th Aug 2008, 10:56 pm
ScreamingMimi wrote:
Being killed for trespassing is a bit extreme
the punishment much outweighs the crimeThe punishment wouldn't occur if the crime was not commited.
**********Warning the above post may contain irony, lies or outright sarcasm********** - Posted: Wed 20th Aug 2008, 11:05 pm
vampir3uk wrote:
The punishment wouldn't occur if the crime was not commited.
Using that sort of justification could apply to the most outrageous of situations
E.G. I was sitting next to someone in class who stole my pencil and wasn't going to give it back, so I shoved a pen in his eye.
Well I wouldn't have shoved the pen in his eye is he hadn't stolen my pencil.Last edited by Amelia., Wed 20th Aug 2008, 11:05 pm. - Posted: Wed 20th Aug 2008, 11:09 pm It shouldn't ever be legal to intentionally take someone's life.
dollface
Account removed - Posted: Wed 20th Aug 2008, 11:10 pm If somebody trespasses onto my property, already having been warned not to trespass, they deserve to get shot.
Himmler
Account removed - Posted: Thu 21st Aug 2008, 12:01 am
ScreamingMimi wrote:
Using that sort of justification could apply to the most outrageous of situations
E.G. I was sitting next to someone in class who stole my pencil and wasn't going to give it back, so I shoved a pen in his eye.
Well I wouldn't have shoved the pen in his eye is he hadn't stolen my pencil.No that is you introducing a red herring for a example, when you break into another persons house you have invaded their property with a criminal intention, if they are then killed it is their fault for breaking the law and entering that persons property.
**********Warning the above post may contain irony, lies or outright sarcasm********** - Posted: Thu 21st Aug 2008, 12:05 am
vampir3uk wrote:
No that is you introducing a red herring for a example, when you break into another persons house you have invaded their property with a criminal intention, if they are then killed it is their fault for breaking the law and entering that persons property.
Agree to disagree
The end. - Posted: Thu 21st Aug 2008, 12:12 am This is not a agree to disagree discussion, it is nothing but logic once again.**********Warning the above post may contain irony, lies or outright sarcasm**********
- Posted: Thu 21st Aug 2008, 12:27 am
yeah yeah *rolls eyes*
=) - Posted: Thu 21st Aug 2008, 12:41 am
vampir3uk wrote:
This is not a agree to disagree discussion, it is nothing but logic once again.Dude she so totally cyber beat your arse twice. Clearly.
- Posted: Thu 21st Aug 2008, 2:37 am Her ability to walk away with her head up her arse is unrivaled.
**********Warning the above post may contain irony, lies or outright sarcasm********** - Posted: Thu 21st Aug 2008, 2:49 am
^.^<3
- Posted: Thu 21st Aug 2008, 9:06 am
PointyPenis wrote:
Taking someone else's life shouldn't be "legal" as such, but if it's entirely necessary, then fine.
You don't have to kill to get out of anything, you can injure or wound instead, buying you time.
Only professionals can have that control or a background in martial arts or other fighting techinques. If a random person gets into a situation they don't have a clue what can or won't kill someone.
On Topic: I would kill to protect myself and family, friends, gf. It has to be a specific intense situation for me to do it. If I can get away with only break some arms, legs then I would take that. Last resort to kill and its acceptable to kill in my book in obviously life threatening situations.
Not sure why people don't think its acceptable to kill. The difference is law prosecutes people that kill with unnecessary motives.
''All pretence has been abandoned, as both teams take to the field naked covered in lubricated to sound of pounding techno.''
Frankie Boyle, Mock the Mock. 2007.
