It's really cute how some people avoid actually arguing with relevant points.
'You're wrong, you fag'
| Results | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes, it was a cover up | 41 | 40% | |
| No, Bin Laden/Taliban did it | 44 | 43% | |
| I cant decide | 17 | 17% | |
It's really cute how some people avoid actually arguing with relevant points.
'You're wrong, you fag'
Adobe Flash Player could not be loaded.
Please install or upgrade to the latest version.
Spyro wrote:
Adobe Flash Player could not be loaded.
YouTube Video
Please install or upgrade to the latest version.
I hope you're not posting that as some kind of proof of why they collapsed..?
If so, it should be pointed out that the government are fantastic at making sure the right companies and establishments carry out their work for them to further enhance any story they may have given by using very convincing explainations of unrealistic events.
As I've pointed out, you can make the mass of people believe anything if you keep telling them enough, and again, once you blindly label anyone who disagrees as being "unpatriotic" or a "conspiracy theorist", then it's pretty easy to keep the lie going.
FEMA, NIST and Popular Mechanics are all hugely influenced by those in high power, so they would be happy to strengthen an entirely fictional story to further convince the public what they've been told is true.
FEMA arrived in New York the evening before 9/11 and were the first rescue team in, as well as shipping off all the WTC tower steel to China before it could be properly investigated, which I think you'll find is highly illegal.
My god, there's just so much you people don't understand...
It's so good
Baby, when you're at the wheel
I can't believe the way I feel
It's such a rush just being with you
We're driving in the Rush Hour...
eek
![]()
vampir3uk wrote:
Remember kids, if it's on the internet it must be true!
The very fact that you believe the TV, but nobody who disagrees with it on your computer, makes you an epic moron.
You are the very definition of the term, "broaden your horizons".
Anyway, I said I wasn't replying to you anymore because you have the intelligence of a piece of driftwood floating down the Mississippi river.
It's so good
Baby, when you're at the wheel
I can't believe the way I feel
It's such a rush just being with you
We're driving in the Rush Hour...
pyjm84 wrote:
I hope you're not posting that as some kind of proof of why they collapsed..?
No.
As an american who has lived under this government for almost 50 years, (and worked for them as well) let me state for the record that
1) They clearly have the ability to do this
2) They clearly have proven that they could never cover it up
3) They would not have targeted the pentagon in an area that had already had its asbestos removed and cleaned up
4) They can't keep a secret (see #2)
5) They can't plan far enough ahead for this to make sense
6) As for using it as an excuse, they would have hit a more compelling target that would have outraged more americans long term (think something like Disneyworld) NY is its own little world to a lot of americans, and although we got upset, it was just NY...
So I vote no on America being involved - don't give the Bush Administration more credit than it deserves
All Mushrooms are edible
But some
Only once
TXISDude wrote:
As an american who has lived under this government for almost 50 years, (and worked for them as well) let me state for the record that
1) They clearly have the ability to do this
2) They clearly have proven that they could never cover it up
3) They would not have targeted the pentagon in an area that had already had its asbestos removed and cleaned up
4) They can't keep a secret (see #2)
5) They can't plan far enough ahead for this to make sense
6) As for using it as an excuse, they would have hit a more compelling target that would have outraged more americans long term (think something like Disneyworld) NY is its own little world to a lot of americans, and although we got upset, it was just NY...
So I vote no on America being involved - don't give the Bush Administration more credit than it deserves
That's where people go wrong though. People say Bush is incapable of doing his own shoelaces, so how could he mastermind ANYTHING complicated, but the simple fact is, the ruling government is not the highest power. There are much more influential and powerful people than those in the current, or future, administration(s).
It's so good
Baby, when you're at the wheel
I can't believe the way I feel
It's such a rush just being with you
We're driving in the Rush Hour...

Jews did 9/11:11\6, I hold IRREFUTABLE PROOF.
Linear time is LIE. Cubic time is TRUTH, you are EDUCATED STUPID, SEE BEYOND.
I HAVE IRREFUTABLE PROOF. FOUR SIMULTANOUS DAYS IN ONE ROTATION OF EARTH, EACH QUADRANT OF EARTH.
Man is personified pyramid, 1 corner of time cube, 1 24 hr day. 1/4th of a person. pyramid * 6 equals star of david = the BALANCE = 11:11 = equilibrium in timeSpace. Four 24 hr days, simultaneously, equals 11:11 - 11:11 = natural balance. 6/11 = 11\9 = 9/11:11\6 = cubeless jews did wtc.
Man is but extension of the 9/11:11\6, four corners, four simultaneous 24 hour days. Cubeless god, jewish god, jews did 9/11:11\6. I have IRREFUTABLE PROOF. Ignorant dumb asses laugh at me, they do not know. 9/11 tragedy was caused by JEWISH LIE and CONSPIRACY. ZOG means students are EDUCATED STUPID with CUBELESS LINEAR TIME LIE. I have uncovered the truth, the spirit guardians have alerted. 11:11. I DEMONSTRATE IRREFUTABLE PROOF.

911 is also 191 - 9=endings. 11 is balance which takes us to 11:11. 9/11:11\6 = STAR OF DAVID = CUBELESS IDIOT JEWISH GOD DID WTC. JEWS DID WTC; I PRESENT IRREFUTABLE PROOF. THINK.
/sarcasm
1337 []D05te|2
Dr. Nobody wrote:
Things were rocky and then when we finally decided to get intimate, I discovered something very unexpected. Apparently, she hasn't finished her "transformation" and still has a penis. Now I love her even more.

pyjm84 wrote:
What isn't consistent enough???
The only reason the official story is considered consistent is because it was endlessly repeated on the news until it sunk into stupid people's minds as the truth.
Where is YOUR proof? Do you consider watching and repeating the news research?
People who base their entire argument on what they saw on the news have no right to instantly dismiss points put forward by people who do proper research.
Have you ever seen the FEMA anti-terrorism brochures from 1997 and 2000?
The ones with the WTC on the front cover with a crosshair on them. No?
Or a neo-conservative thinktank called "Project for a New American Century - PNAC" headed by Dick Cheney which called for "a catalyzing event, like a new Pearl Harbour" to allow America to expand it's military spending and give it a reason to attack Iraq? This was in 2000, as well.
Or NORAD conducting "Amalgam Virgo 01" on June 1st, 2001, which was an exercise involving a cruise missile attack scenario in which their presentation manual has a photo of Osama bin Laden on the cover and a picture of an exploding skyscraper inside?
I could go on. The evidence is staggering.
But how is the evidence for a government cover up consistent, if this was a court case it'd be quashed!
I get up when I'm down ,I can't swim but my soul won't drown
I do believe I've got flare ,I got speed and I walk on air
L0ONEYTOON wrote:
But how is the evidence for a government cover up consistent, if this was a court case it'd be quashed!
Because the scientific facts don't change, but fake stories involving hijackers passports do.
We're supposed to believe a passport of one of them landed nicely on the floor in the rubble and the FBI found it and said who it was only for him to be on the news in his own country the next day perfectly fine?
The story then just vanished from the papers and was never mentioned again. That's the power that can be exercised when everything in print and on television is under the control of a few large companies.
It's so good
Baby, when you're at the wheel
I can't believe the way I feel
It's such a rush just being with you
We're driving in the Rush Hour...
pyjm84 wrote:
Because the scientific facts don't change, but fake stories involving hijackers passports do.
We're supposed to believe a passport of one of them landed nicely on the floor in the rubble and the FBI found it and said who it was only for him to be on the news in his own country the next day perfectly fine?
The story then just vanished from the papers and was never mentioned again. That's the power that can be exercised when everything in print and on television is under the control of a few large companies.
I'm not saying there aren't consistencies, just not enough consistent proof to prove an actual conspiracy, in fact the JFK assasination seems to be the most consistent one.
I get up when I'm down ,I can't swim but my soul won't drown
I do believe I've got flare ,I got speed and I walk on air
Dee
![]()